data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7b4b/e7b4b5364eda79420426206eb71b8377ad69ef9f" alt=""
And, even by Olympus's standards of entry-level generosity, it's not short on toys - including an articulated screen to make full use of its live view system, which itself is one of the better implementations of this feature (from the company that got there first). It's also got 'Art' modes and the ability to shoot in four different aspect ratios - adapted from the features of the recently announced E-30. There's also in-body Image Stabilization and a level of configurability that is unparalleled in this class. In fact it's astonishing how much Olympus has crammed into its small dimensions - it's nearer to the size of the E-4X0 than the E-5X0 series (due in part to use of the small BLS-1 battery), and the E-420 was famously the smallest DSLR in the world.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aafc/5aafcf718a7b4e164565ee8d28a863465507045b" alt=""
Compared to E-30 - key differences
When the E-30 was launched, we commented that it sailed remarkably close to E-3 territory, but with a smaller viewfinder and less grand claims made about environmental sealing and image stabilization. The E-620 comes close to pulling the same trick on the E-30; again the size of the viewfinder is smaller, but the cameras share the same 12 megapixel sensor, Truepix III+ processing and a great many other features. The differences between the two cameras are easier to list than the similarities:
* E-620 is smaller (by around 1cm in each dimension) and around 180g lighter (body only)
* Slightly smaller viewfinder with reduced frame coverage (0.96x, 95%, vs. 1.02x, 98%)
* 7-point AF (5 cross-type) vs. 11-point (all cross-type)
* Improved LCD (Hypercrystal III, vs. E-30s' version II unit)
* Only one control dial (vs. E-30's two)
* Slower continuous shooting rate (4fps for 5 RAW frames, vs. 5fps for 12)
* Fewer aspect ratio crops (3 vs. 8)
* No built-in digital level gauge
* Only allows two exposures to be overlaid in multi-exposure mode (vs. 4)
* No PC flash sync or DC-in sockets
* Slower x-sync (1/180 sec vs. 1/250 sec) and max shutter speed (1/4000 sec vs. 1/8000 sec)
* Lower capacity BLS-1 battery (7.2V 1150 mAh) vs. BLM-1 (7.2V 1500 mAh)
Key feature comparison (vs E-30 and E-520)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37850/378506e87e41318be6c5816d57ccd978722041be" alt=""
The E-620 is overall smaller than the E-520 that sits below it in the E-system hierarchy, while offering a slightly larger viewfinder plus a selection of the features we were just getting to grips with in the considerably more expensive E-30. The chart below shows the key spec differences between the three cameras that now span the middle of the Olympus DSLR range.
{ 0 komentar... read them below or add one }
Posting Komentar